I'll be the first one to admit that there are plenty of projects where I've heard of overbearing or wacko maintainers who have weird ideas about what the project should or shouldn't do. You got a problem with that? You don't think the direction of the project is going in the right way? That's fine - FORK. I, and most others, can't commit directly to the Thunderbird source repo That would drive Firefox's share of the market up, as existing users would not leave, and new users would use it to get access to the new changes that they want to use. Firefox should include lots of wanted changes, and few to no unwanted changes. That's what drives users away, sending Firefox's share of the market from the mid-30% range down to single-digits. Firefox typically includes lots of unwanted changes, with very few wanted changes. They rarely make changes that the Firefox users actually want!įirefox's approach to change is upside down. This is another area where Firefox devs fuck up. They want support for new features and functionality that they desire. Those are the kinds of changes that are unwanted, because they cause problems for users. Far too many of the changes to Firefox are dumb, dumb, dumb! We aren't talking about one or two bad ones now and then. The problem with Firefox is that the changes are fucking idiotic. The problem with Firefox isn't that there's change.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |